For a long time, I’ve made it a point to forget huge
chunks of my childhood. This class, however, has forced me to recall more than
I thought I could. We had an assignment not too long ago that asked us to make
a list of our “firsts” which I thought would be hard. To my surprise, I had a
nice list going when the timer buzzed. Actively seeing a memory play out in my
head after pushing it away for so long was a bit of a shock to the system.
A few of my firsts were my first sleepover, my first surgery, and my first time feeling loved. Remembering those moments that seemed so minuscule at the time felt explosive. It was as if all my childhood came rushing back all at once. Now that I have these memories readily available to me, I thought that writing my creative nonfiction assignments would be easier. I was wrong. I can call on these memories easily but putting them on paper is hard.
The first creative nonfiction assignment was easy for me
to write because I had been thinking about that specific memory for a few
weeks. However, the next assignment threw me. I did not have a single idea of
what to write until the night before it was due (even after the extension). I
settled on telling the story of how I became obsessed with becoming a marine
biologist because that story came up in a conversation with my family after
turning in the “firsts” assignment. While the topics of my creative nonfiction
pieces have been both difficult to fathom as well as lighthearted, I worry
about future assignments. I do not want my work to be emotionally draining for one
to read, but I do not want it to lack truth either. Finding the line between
the two feels as if it is becoming increasingly difficult in all aspects of
writing this semester.
As we read The Library Book by Susan Orlean this
week, I realized that a story from my point of view does not have to be all
about emotion to have a capacity for truth. The novel focuses on the history of
the L.A. Central Library that burned in April 1986. I found the story
compelling as it was historically focused but kept the author’s narrative in
the mix. There was a balance between Orlean’s telling of her research as well
as her own connection that she felt to the information she had found. I feel
that if I can write in a similar fashion, I can achieve the balance that I have
been trying to create as well.
I am determined to get some of my memories down on paper
because the more that I think about them, the more I realize how many moments
have shaped me into who I am today. Instead of floating through life, I can
look back and see how each individual moment that I recall holds more weight in
my life than I could have ever imagined.
I feel the same way about writing personal stories. Most of my favorite memories happened right after a period of struggle or stress, and it can be extremely hard to think about in a positive way. It’s hard to include the whole truth of certain memories while also telling the story of the uncomfortable moments that brought me there. Your opinion on The Library Book is extremely interesting, especially about Orlean’s personal narrative. I think that her personal experience with the library was why I connected to the book so much. However, the narratives of the past head librarians were just as important in my opinion. If the library was a living breathing person, the stories of the staff members would be its “memories”. As we see throughout this book, every librarian established good things, yet some ideas were not executed very well. These mistakes would be the equivalent of our bad memories. After reading your blog, I have a different view of how my memories can shape my stories. It may be difficult to dig deep and bring out my personal experiences at first, but these uncomfortable experiences will make my stories more meaningful.
ReplyDelete